<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for westhawthorn.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.westhawthorn.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.westhawthorn.org</link>
	<description>A West Hawthorn Community Initiative</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on WHUDF - Council meeting a success by Kaye Perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.westhawthorn.org/2008/03/18/whudf-council-meeting-a-success/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaye Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westhawthorn.org/2008/03/18/whudf-council-meeting-a-success/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>This requires a follow-up to ensure that Council have done what they agreed at the council meeting.  It's nearly 3 months later and I haven't seen anything presented back to the community.  Do they have a deadline for amendments before the process starts again from scratch?  I have at the back of my mind that if the Minister has not approved the changes before the end of this year, that the time limit has expired.  This might be incorrect, as I have not been directly involved in this process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This requires a follow-up to ensure that Council have done what they agreed at the council meeting.  It&#8217;s nearly 3 months later and I haven&#8217;t seen anything presented back to the community.  Do they have a deadline for amendments before the process starts again from scratch?  I have at the back of my mind that if the Minister has not approved the changes before the end of this year, that the time limit has expired.  This might be incorrect, as I have not been directly involved in this process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact Us by westhawthorn.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; West Hawthorn Urban Design Framework</title>
		<link>http://www.westhawthorn.org/contact/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>westhawthorn.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; West Hawthorn Urban Design Framework</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westhawthorn.org/contact/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] Some residents have organised a letter to be signed to alert council of the stong feeling in the community over this issue. If you can help getting further signitures to this letter, please get in contact with us. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some residents have organised a letter to be signed to alert council of the stong feeling in the community over this issue. If you can help getting further signitures to this letter, please get in contact with us. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Council drops all objections to 108 Power Street Proposal by Megan Peniston-Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.westhawthorn.org/2007/08/31/council-drops-all-objections-to-108-power-street-proposal/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Peniston-Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westhawthorn.org/2007/08/31/council-drops-all-objections-to-108-power-street-proposal/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>108 POWER ST; ALL ALONE AT VCAT
Monday Sept 3 Lillian Lewis, Nick Mules and myself attended the hearing at VCAt. Unfortunately by the afternoon I was the only objector left, a rather intimidating experience! However Chairman Potts went out of his way to show me cosideration and he asked searching questions of the experts. He has deferred his response which will be posted to registered objectors.
I understand that Council withdrew its objection on traffic grounds because it could not find an engineer to support its objection. Very disappointing. We now await Mr Potts decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>108 POWER ST; ALL ALONE AT VCAT<br />
Monday Sept 3 Lillian Lewis, Nick Mules and myself attended the hearing at VCAt. Unfortunately by the afternoon I was the only objector left, a rather intimidating experience! However Chairman Potts went out of his way to show me cosideration and he asked searching questions of the experts. He has deferred his response which will be posted to registered objectors.<br />
I understand that Council withdrew its objection on traffic grounds because it could not find an engineer to support its objection. Very disappointing. We now await Mr Potts decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
